Please sign in for your conference participation
Sign In
Forgot Password Reset
Abstract Review
Abstract Scoring Rubric – Total Score is 27
| Criteria | Excellent – 3 points | Good – 2 points | Average – 1 point | Poor – 0 points |
| 1) Relevance to Theme/Track | Directly addresses the theme or topic with clear alignment. | Mostly aligns with the theme/topic. | Limited connection to theme/topic. | Does not align with the theme/topic.
|
| 2) Title | Title is specific and concise.
|
The title is somewhat specific and concise but lacking in specifics. | The title is not specific or concise.
|
Title does not match abstract information.
|
| 3) Background and Aims | The context, background and aims are concise, clearly stated and well defined. | The context, background and aims are stated with minor ambiguity. | The context, background and aims are stated but vague or unclear. | The context, background and aims are unclear or missing. |
| 4) Methodology/Approach Taken | Methods are clear, described in detail and describe exactly what was done. | Methods are described but with some gaps. | Methods are insufficient and only some key elements are included. | No clear methodology provided. |
| 5) Results/Findings | Results are clear, relevant, and well-presented and easy to interpret. | Results are presented but lack clarity or detail. | Some results/findings, but weak or unclear. | No results/findings provided. |
| 6) Conclusion | Conclusions are impactful, well-articulated, insightful, and clearly linked to findings and objectives | Conclusion is clear and generally supports the findings | Conclusion is weak or not well linked to findings. | Conclusion is missing or unclear. |
| 7) Quality of Writing and Appeal | Abstract is clear, concise, and free of errors. | Mostly clear; minor errors or wordiness. | Some issues with clarity, structure, or language. | Poorly written; hard to understand. |
| 8) Impact/Significance | Strong potential for impact on field/practice/policy. | Good potential for relevance or impact. | Moderate or unclear impact. | Minimal or no impact shown. |
| 9) Innovation/Originality | Highly original; presents novel ideas or approaches. | Some original elements; adds value. | Limited originality; common ideas. | Lacks originality, repetitive content. |
Copyright ©2025 all rights reserved
Designed by creativeDNA | Admin Login